News Summary: 2nd February 2010

February 2nd, 2010 - 

Macmillan Publishers seem to be quite successfully capitalising on the bitter rivalry between America’s technology giants, Apple and Amazon, to strike a blow for old media by forcing through price increases on digital versions of its books.

Macmillan is one of five publishers – along with Penguin, HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster and Hachette – to have signed up with Apple to make ebooks available through its online iBookstore. Last weekend, Amazon removed Macmillan books from its US website (more in the Guardian HERE and FT HERE) in protest at the publisher’s demand that they match the $12.99 and $14.99 pricings suggested by Apple. Protestations by the publishing industry then forced Amazon into a U-turn hours later (more in the Telegraph HERE and HERE and in the FT HERE). Amazon told readers:

‘We want you to know that ultimately… we will have to accept Macmillan’s terms because Macmillan has a monopoly over their own titles, and we will want to offer them to you, even at prices we believe to be needlessly high for ebooks’.

Is the use of the term ‘monopoly’ accidental, or a flagging up to regulators potential price-fixing between publishers and Apple, and/ or a gearing-up for a legal battle? More in the Guardian HERE and Independent HERE.

Google Books’ plans to carry ‘substantial extracts’ of books that are out of print but still within copyright, with buyers then paying to download the title in full, continues to be criticised as a ‘massive rights’ grab’. Revenue generated would be split, with 63% going to the rights holder and the rest to Google. Philip Pullman, author of the His Dark Materials trilogy, has said:

‘Just because a book is out of print doesn’t mean it belongs to Google. It belongs to me. And if I want to sell my rights to anybody, why the hell should I have to go and ask Google first?’

American authors, publishing organisations and Google are currently trying to agree the settlement, which has yet to be ratified by a New York court and could be one of the most important agreements in digital publishing. Google insists the proposed settlement ‘is not about acquiring rights to books… It is about creating a new revenue channel for rights holders, and opening up access to these books’. More in the Guardian HERE, with British author’s reactions so far in The Times HERE.

Does Habermas have a Tweet for you?! The German social theorist and philosopher Jürgen Habermas apparently tweeted the following ‘It’s true that the internet has reactivated the grass-roots of an egalitarian public sphere of writers and readers’. But, alas, when asked if he had indeed joined Twitter, the 80 year old Frankfurt School doyen is said to have responded ‘No, no, no…This is a misuse of my name.’ see more HERE. We however like to take this opportunity to happily inform you that Ed’s Twitter Page is bona fide and that he can be found merrily tweeting away every day, and does so like to be followed…

News Summary: 16 December 2009

December 16th, 2009 - 

YouTube are considering offering subscription services that allow users to watch major new TV shows and films online. Some broadcaster including Channel $ and Channel Five have already forged deals with the Californian website to show full-length programmes online, Youtube is now considering paid options as well. More HERE.

Online security group Detica is launching a system that con monitor illegal filesharing over Virigin Media’s Network. It has dismissed concerns that it could be used to identify and spy on individual users, saying ‘customer privacy is at the very heart of this’ more HERE.

Rage Against the Machine was outselling X Factor Winner Joe McElderry in the midweek sales figures, more HERE. More than 500,000 people have joined a campaign on Facebook encouraging people to by the 1992 single Killing in the Name in an attempt to upset Simon Cowell’s domination of the Christmas charts.

A new website plans to use commuters’ music players to revive the art of the short story by selling audiobooks of work by famous writers. More HERE

Just starting to warm up, with the Golden Globe nominations out. Congratulations to British nominees Helen Mirren, Carey Mulligan and Emily Blunt more HERE.

The Guardian Fashion Awards for the year are out HERE. And no, we have no idea what that thing on Madonna’s head is either.

Ed was interviewed by the BBC’s Hard Talk this week, talking about culture and media policies and the wider Conservative agenda more HERE.

The Politics of Culture

October 16th, 2009 - 

Welcome to our new blog. As some of our readers know, we send out a weekly e-mail up-dating people on what is happening in the world where politics, culture and the creative industries collide (to subscribe e-mail Ed HERE). This blog is complementary to that.  We’ll try and up-date it daily, and if you want to write for it, please just ask.

Culture and the creative industries are not taken as seriously in the world of politics as they should be.  We hope to change that.  At Conference in Manchester, we reflected on the huge amount of time we spent visiting cultural organisations that really make the city tick – the Royal Exchange, Manchester Camerata, Manchester City Art Gallery, Cornerhouse, Contact Theatre, the Lowry, the People’s History Museum.  There is the Halle, and the Royal Opera House planning a centre here, not to mention the BBC and Media City in Salford.  Then there are the huge range of creative businesses, far higher than the national average.  More than anything, they contribute to the quality of life in Manchester, and are a big reason why people move there.

The creative industries are often cited as the key to the country’s economic future, particularly after the recent financial crisis.  It’s true. Web companies, video games, films, music, design, advertising, architecture – we lead the world in many of these areas, and export globally.  We should support them as much as we can, and sing their success from the rooftops.

Culture is important for its own sake, but it is crucial economically as well, in terms of tourism and regeneration.  It touches the work of so many other areas –education, health, communities, international development, almost any Department you care to name.

The DCMS is a small Department, but it could and should be hugely influential, shaping the agendas of many of its bigger colleagues.  We hope if we win the election to ensure that it does.

Meantime, enjoy the blog.

Ed.

Frieze Art Fair

October 16th, 2009 - 
Tags:

The Frieze art fair opened yesterday and the mood is buoyant, according to this round up, HERE.

Ed was there, and had his picture taken, HERE.

Lisa Armstrong on our fashion round table

September 3rd, 2009 - 

Ed hosted a fashion round table at the end of August. It was a lively discussion (our favourite kind).  Among the issues we looked at were: the perception of the industry, (it’s the UK’s second largest employer but seems to be rarely taken seriously by politicans and the media), skills and training, UK manufacturing, business development, the realtionship between the high street and high fashion, and how we can support this world leading sector. Our thanks to the Brithsh Fashion Council for putting it together, we are already excited about London Fashion Week in September, and there were many ideas we hope to  take forward , so watch this space for news. Meanwhile, Lisa Armstrong, fashion editor of The Times, attended, and gives us her view:

Did you know that fashion is the second largest employer in the UK? It is if you throw in retail sector workers, carrier bag and hanger manufacturers, dry cleaners and textile designers. So it’s not just about designers saying, ” I’m feeling for chiffon, sweeties, ” or devilish magazine editors swanning about in Prada.

Not that you’d necessarily know this from the way politicians react when they’re asked to comment on fashion related issues, as they occasionally are – the knee-jerk clap trap they spouted during the size zero debate being a particularly unedifying example.

I’m not suggesting that Harriet Harman needs to clarify Labour policy on shoulder pads, or that Michael Gove should set up cross party talks with Miuccia Prada. But the sneering, seemingly deliberately misinformed tone that politicians adopt when they talk about this industry needs to go.

It’s outdated, patronizing to the millions of people in this country who are interested in design or who work in the business and unhelpful.

Fashion is one of UK Inc’s success stories. It may have suffered recently – who hasn’t?  - but the British high street is one of the most vibrant, adaptable economies in the world. British designers are sought after by global luxury brands. British fashion colleges are widely acknowledged to be the best in the world. London Fashion Week is an invaluable flag-waver for Britain’s reputation as a cultural power-house, punching way above its weight. Savile Row is revered throughout the world as a beacon of quality…but not in Westminster it seems, where many politicians are terrified of being seen as frivolous…So it’s ok for Gordon Brown to pretend to care about football or ring up Simon Cowell when Susan Boyle’s not feeling herself. But please don’t expect him to know the names of Britain’s world-influential designers.

I’m running away with myself -but then it’s not often the fashion industry gets the chance to put its case across to ministers. Still, that’s what happened when Ed Vaisey invited (or did we invite ourselves?)  a group of designers (high end and high street), prs, fashion college heads and a fashion journalist (that was me) to meet around a large table in Portcullis House.

What case? Didn’t I just say fashion was a success story? It is, but one that’s constantly under-threat. Clothes manufacturing in the UK has dwindled to a point where it’s almost impossible to get anything made here. That doesn’t matter for the high street giants who can outsource anywhere they want. But it’s a huge headache for the smaller designers, without whom the British high street would be infinitely worse off, as would carrier bag and hanger manufacturers….then there are the colleges like St Martin’s who have to watch while 32 per cent of their lovingly nurtured graduates have to go abroad for jobs, the proposed introduction of a minimum wage for interns which will wipe out scores of smaller designer’s businesses.  Oh and New York fashion week wants to wipe out London Fashion Week (why isn’t that surprising?) which does matter by the way, because LFW’s value to the UK’s design exports is incalculable.

Naturally one of Ed’s first questions was about where he could get fashion advice. Of course it was. Where there’s a politician, a dismissive little joke about fashion is never far behind. But credit to Ed, he made a rapid recovery and seemed to get the point very quickly of what can seem an abstruse and elitist industry. So, to recap the cliffhangers (yes it got heated) : if they get in, will the Tories make any progress on rebuilding the kind of manufacturing that would help fashion in this country? Should they? What about tax relief on those interns? Could international retailers be persuaded to sign a code of conduct that would prevent them ripping off designers and not paying them? Who knows?

Should Mps take in the occasional fashion show? All these and more questions remain utterly un-answered. But at least they’re asking the questions. One thing I can say, no one was feeling for chiffon and I don’t think anyone wore Prada.

 

Lisa Armstrong is the fashion editor of The Times.